Spoilers abound, so be wise.
Murder, the occult, the creepy Louisiana bayou, satanic abuse, time being unveiled as a flat circle, an exploration of American masculinity, revenge sex, mythology, Matthew McConnaughey resurrecting his acting career while wearing a range of fetching blazers – True Detective season 1 had it all.
Except a believable and not sexualised (or explored solely in relation to her relationship with a man) female character. (For the record, I liked Maggie – played by Michelle Monaghan – but we got nary a glimpse into her interior life, or her character not in relation to being a wife/sex object.)
So when Rachel McAdams was confirmed as a main character in TD’s second season, we had a reason to rejoice. Finally! Nic Pizzolatto could boot those sexism accusations and complaints (which not everyone agreed with) into the grave and show that True Detective didn’t have a woman problem after all.
Except, now that the second season’s first episode has arrived, it appears that this ‘woman problem’ is still as obvious as the first signs of PMS. It’s there alright, but you hope it’ll soon abate. Given that we’re just one episode in, I’m cautious, but I’d take a painkiller regardless.
Given that Louisiana native Pizzolatto (who alongside director Cary Fukunaga created a great first season – despite an unsatisfying ending – of a stunning, dark and troubling series that reeled me in completely) doesn’t have a writing room, and – heroically – crafts the series on his lonesome, I wondered what it would be like if a woman had an input into the writing of True Detective.
Which led to these imaginary conversations in an imaginary writer’s room between an imaginary man* and (cough) imaginary woman, about the parts of the episode that had me laughing out loud or rolling my eyes at how cliched or unknowingly sexist they were.
MAN: So, we’ve decided on having a female cop – hardworking, determined, can’t hold down a relationship, tough cookie etc etc.
WOMAN: Great – so it’ll be her and one other cop. Partners?
MAN: Yeah, a detective but they’re not partners, and then a motorcycle cop but he won’t be her partner, and then the other main guy will be a sort of underworld character. You know, gangster.
WOMAN: So there’ll be one main woman and three main men?
MAN: Structural necessity. Got a lot of stick last time for not having a solid main woman. We have another woman too, but she’s not as major. A wife.
***
WOMAN: Paul Woodrugh walks in, looking troubled, and his girlfriend is waiting in the bedroom.
MAN: Yeah, she’s on the bed, in her underwear, waiting for him and then he just bursts in all brooding and a bit angry, y’know?
WOMAN: Is she reading?
MAN: Reading? No, she’s waiting for him.
WOMAN: Ok, on her phone? Studying?
MAN: No, just waiting.
WOMAN: Eating something?
MAN: Nope, she’s doing nothing.
WOMAN: Maybe she’s watching a bit of TV.
MAN: No, she’s just waiting there for him in her underwear, on the bed.
***
MAN: I’m seeing Semyon as wise – like, he’s been through a lot.
WOMAN: Yeah. Former gangster, bad guy trying to go legitimate.
MAN: Exactly. So he’s wise and he says these wise things.
WOMAN: Like…
MAN: So far we’ve got: ‘Never do anything out of hunger. Like eating.’ People really listen to him.
WOMAN: Right. Even eating? Anyway – anything else…
MAN: ‘A good woman mitigates our baser tendencies’.
WOMAN: Any others?
MAN: ‘Sometimes your worst self is your best self’. See? Wise.
***
MAN: What makes it so tragic is that years ago, Velcoro’s wife was raped. So he’s angry, and traumatised. And he doesn’t know if the kid is his.
WOMAN: Awful, totally traumatising for her… so we meet her right after we find out, or maybe at the end?
MAN: No, she’s not in the first episode.
WOMAN: The woman who was raped isn’t? They still together?
MAN: No, split up, he’s angry, she’s with another guy now. We meet him.
WOMAN: Who, the new partner?
MAN: Yeah, nice guy, looks after the kid.
WOMAN: So we meet him but not the woman who’s raped, who’s the reason why Velcoro is so angry.
MAN: Yeah, but we meet the son too. Structural necessity.
***
MAN: Ani and the guy are arguing about sex in the kitchen – she’s badass.
WOMAN: That’s the first time we meet her?
MAN: Yeah, so we know – this woman doesn’t fuck around, even when she fucks. She’s bad, she’s an outlier, she’s strong. She basically kicks him out.
WOMAN: So the first time we meet her, it’s in relation to her having sex, even though she’s a police officer.
MAN: First time we meet her we see how strong she is – she takes no shit.
WOMAN: And we couldn’t see her in shooting practice, or on her own at home, or in work, or…
***
MAN: Then the blonde in the car basically propositions Woodrugh, and he’s conflicted. But he sees she has an ankle monitor.. anyway, he ends up in trouble and is suspended.
WOMAN: Right. So this woman just propositions him out of nowhere, even though she’s got an ankle monitor, so she can avoid a ticket.
MAN: It’s California. She’s clearly troubled, he’s troubled too. It gives us an insight into what he’d do in work.
WOMAN: Is that something people do though, offer sexual favours to cops?
MAN: She’s troubled. And good-looking.
WOMAN: And do we even find out the sex lady’s name?
MAN: It doesn’t matter, she’s only in it for a few minutes.
***
Episode two of season two of True Detective airs on Sky Atlantic on Tuesday, and, yes, of course I’ll be watching. And hoping that the woman problem eases a little…
*Literally one man, not all men, or even the man.
All images are screengrabs from this trailer.
Sweet Oblivion 
Just watched it today, and the rape plot sat so oddly with me and it was only when I read this that I realised why. She’s totally faceless, and the way that her traumatic rape becomes an incident all about Farreller was just weird. Unless they revisit this in great detail and introduce us to her character and feelings in the rest of the series, it’ll just be a very badly judged plot device.
Also, knotted at the “sexy woman in bed just waiting” bit. You’d definitely either be having a read or scrolling through your phone.
I cannot wait for more of the little wise quips. I particularly enjoyed “astronauts don’t even go to the moon anymore”. Colin Farrell’s great in it, fair play to him, but I will be super disappointed if they don’t do more interesting stuff with Rachel McAdams.
God those wise quips are gas aren’t they? And the way Vaughn delivers them, so unknowingly deadpan. Mad.
The rape plot is just awful, in that of course it would be really terrible for Velcoro – and no doubt we’ll find out more details about it soon – but the fact his wife just didn’t even exist beyond the rape… weird is the right word. And the poor son too, thought he was a bit too much of a caricature.
The sexy woman in bed bit was just so funny to watch. Just so unrealistic. Even if she was just waiting there for the ride, she wouldn’t be just… sitting there… doing nothing the whole time. We know nothing about her other than she’s just there for the ride.
And yep, I hope they do more with McAdams, she’s a great actress and there’s loads of potential there for her character. Even if she is a bit cliched, she is strong and capable and I have my fingers crossed… Farrell is surprisingly great too in this, I agree! Hopefully there will be less exposition and more action next episode. I’ll still fervently watch them all, obv 😉